Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. Woolridge
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Justice.
Appellants Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. (hereinafter called “Sarwark”) and Dan O’Meara (hereinafter called “O’Meara”) appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Maricopa County, entered upon a jury verdict, awarding Alfred Wool-ridge (hereinafter called “plaintiff”) actual damages in the sum of $250 and punitive damages in the sum of $5,000, and from an order denying appellants’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Plaintiff’s complaint set forth one cause of action sounding in malicious prosecution and false imprisonment.
The record shows…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Eastin v. Bank of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WilloughbyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Patania v. SilverstoneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Gonzales v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Mendoza v. K-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.