Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1894No. 19186PublishedCited by 73 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Upon a reconsideration of this case, we are satisfied with the opinion therein filed by Department Two of this court on October 10,1893, and for the reasons there stated the judgment and order appealed from will be affirmed.

Judgment and order affirmed.

The following is the opinion above referred to, rendered by Department Two on the 10th of October, 1893:

The Court.—This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, who is respondent here, through the alleged negligence of defendant. Plaintiff had a verdict for eight thousand dollars, for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Wilson v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Monaghan v. Pacific Rolling Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Orcutt v. Pacific Coast Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API