Legal Opinion

Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1962No. S. F. 20809PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs, members of the Negro race, brought this action for damages and injunctive relief alleging discrimination with respect to the sale of a house in a tract. The first cause of action is based on the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, §§51 and 52, as amended in 1959), which deals with discrimination in “business establishments,” and the second is based on the Hawkins Act (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 35700-35741, added in 1959) which relates to discrimination in “publicly assisted housing accommodations.” Both acts were passed at the 1959 legislative session.

A general demurrer filed by…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Railway Mail Assn. v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of DuarteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API