Legal Opinion

Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1959No. Civ. 23713PublishedCited by 334 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants after their motions for judgment on the pleadings were granted.

The complaint in this ease consists of two causes of action. The first cause of action seeks declaratory relief adjudging that plaintiff was wrongfully discharged by the defendants (his employer) and seeks accrued salary since his discharge. Plaintiff, in effect, alleges that he was employed by the defendant union 1 as a business agent. The defendant Matula, acting for the union as its secretary-treasurer, did the actual hiring and specified the duration to be as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Noble v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Holderby v. International Union of Operating EngineersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by334 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

329 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API