Legal Opinion
Harms v. Oak Meadows
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 30, 2000No. CX-00-298PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
Petitioner, Donna M. Harms, sought review by the court of appeals of the Commissioner of Economic Security’s (Commissioner) decision to deny her reemployment insurance benefits. The court of appeals dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction because Harms failed to timely serve the Commissioner and other relevant parties with the petition for a writ of certiorari as required by Minn.Stat. § 268.105, subd. 7(a) (Supp. 1999). Harms now seeks review of the court of appeals’ decision arguing that timely service of a conformed writ of cer-tiorari should satisfy the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kellar v. Von HoltumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Koehnen v. DufuorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appealCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Gonsior v. Alternative Staffing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Henry v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of J.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II v. Allina Health SystemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota, ex rel. Demetris L. Duncan v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Kennedy v. American Paper Recycling Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.