Legal Opinion
Kellar v. Von Holtum
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 29, 2000No. CX-98-283PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
This appeal involves several questions relating to awards of attorney fees and costs and disbursements in civil litigation. We first address whether the trial court retained jurisdiction to consider awards of costs and disbursements and imposition of attorney fee sanctions after the conclusion of the appellate process. Next, we look to whether the appellants gave adequate notice of their intention to seek sanctions under Minn. R. Civ. P. 11 or Minn.Stat. § 549.21 (1996), repealed and recodified at Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (1998), to support the trial court’s order to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. Chicago Industrial Tire Co., Appeal of Themis N. Anastos and Paul E. PeldyakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Underdahl v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Harms v. Oak MeadowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.