State of Minnesota, ex rel. Demetris L. Duncan v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

Appellant Demetris Duncan filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that the Department of Corrections (DOC) had incorrectly calculated the expiration date of his sentence. Specifically, Duncan argued that, after the DOC revoked his supervised release, it failed to credit his incarceration time against his mandatory conditional-release term. The district court and the court of appeals disagreed and upheld the DOC’s determination of the expiration date of Duncan’s sentence. Because the, phrase “the time the person served on supervised release” under Minn.…