Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
On appeal from the county’s imposition of a volume-based fee as a basis for discharges into a ditch, relator argues that Chapter 103E of the Minnesota Statutes regarding ditches does not authorize a volume-based user fee. Respondent county board argues that it lacked the jurisdiction to grant the outlet for industrial wastewa-ter and that its order should be vacated. Because we conclude that a county board, as a ditch authority, may accept the drainage of clean industrial wastewater, and because the statute allows a county board to assess fees as they relate to benefits…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Harms v. Oak MeadowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re Improvement of Murray County Ditch No. 34Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Holecek v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Independent School District No. 709 v. BonneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In re the Expulsion of Z.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re ZKCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005