Legal Opinion

Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 2004No. A03-1440PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

On appeal from the county’s imposition of a volume-based fee as a basis for discharges into a ditch, relator argues that Chapter 103E of the Minnesota Statutes regarding ditches does not authorize a volume-based user fee. Respondent county board argues that it lacked the jurisdiction to grant the outlet for industrial wastewa-ter and that its order should be vacated. Because we conclude that a county board, as a ditch authority, may accept the drainage of clean industrial wastewater, and because the statute allows a county board to assess fees as they relate to benefits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Harms v. Oak MeadowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. In Re Improvement of Murray County Ditch No. 34Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Holecek v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 709 v. BonneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. In re the Expulsion of Z.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. In Re ZKCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API