Legal Opinion
Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appeal
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 29, 1992No. C8-92-1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
FACTS
The Minnesota Department of Administration certified relator Ultraflex Enterprises to participate in the Minnesota Small Business Procurement Program. That program requires the state to award a certain number of contracts annually to businesses that are majority owned and operated by certain targeted groups including women, minorities, or disabled persons. Minn.Stat. § 16B.19, subd. 2a (Supp.1991).
In June 1992, the Department informed Ultraflex that its certification for participation in the program would be revoked. The Department’s procedural…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re the Occupational License of HaymesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Oster & Pederson, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harms v. Oak MeadowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Molnar v. County of Carver Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Nightclub Management, Ltd. v. City of Cannon FallsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the License Applications of Polk County Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.