Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of J.R.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 2003No. C2-02-378PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant, the mother of J.R., Jr. and A.I.R., appeals an order of the Minnesota Court of Appeals dismissing her appeal of the trial court order terminating her parental rights. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal because appellant failed *2to timely serve the guardian ad litem, a party to the matter, with the notice of appeal within the appeal period. Appellant argues that because termination of parental rights cases are such important cases, a technical violation of the rules of court procedure should not prevent the appeal from proceeding. While we agree…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Ruberg v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.