City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
In this condemnation proceeding, appellant-landowners challenge a district court order denying their motions for summary judgment and finding that the proposed taking is for a public purpose and that the taking is necessary to effectuate the public purpose. Because we conclude that the district court properly applied the law, we affirm.
FACTS
Respondent City of Granite Falls (the city) is a Minnesota municipal corporation located in Chippewa County. Appellants BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) and Twin Cities & Western Railroad Company (TC & W) own property that is the subject…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.