Legal Opinion
HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. Adelmann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 1999No. C2-97-980, C7-97-1199, C6-97-1811Published
1Opinion of the Court
590 N.W.2d 327 (1999)
The HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY In and For the CITY OF RICHFIELD, a Minnesota public body corporate and politic, petitioner, Appellant,
v.
Daniel ADELMANN, Trustee of the Robert F. Adelmann Trust; et al., Respondents (C2-97-980, C6-97-1811), District Court Respondent (C7-97-1199),
F & D Properties, a partnership consisting of Dayle R. Erickson and Fred C. Talbot, Respondent,
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., Respondent (C2-97-980, C6-97-1811), District Court Respondent (C7-97-1199),
Top Line Cycle, Inc., et al., District Court Respondents.
Nos. C2-97-980, C7-97-1199,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. RadosevichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Oronoco School District v. Town of OronocoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Whitely v. Mississippi Water Power & Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.