Legal Opinion

Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 2000No. C6-98-2080PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company issued a disability insurance policy to Martin John Kersten using a definition of sickness that limited coverage of pre-exist-ing conditions to those illnesses that first manifested themselves while the policy was in force. Minnesota Mutual then used this definition to discontinue paying Ker-sten disability benefits under the policy. Therefore, when Minnesota Mutual discontinued paying benefits under this policy, Kersten brought an action in Hennepin County District Court alleging that Minnesota Mutual breached its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Kenneth B. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Galanty v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Shirley R. Adzick v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API