Legal Opinion

Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 2000No. C6-98-2080Published

1Opinion of the Court

608 N.W.2d 869 (2000)

Martin John KERSTEN, Respondent,

v.

The MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

No. C6-98-2080.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 13, 2000.

Steven G. Mahon, Ryan, Mahon & Brown, P.A., St. Paul, for appellant.

Robert E. Wilson, Matthew C. Bazzano, Robert Wilson & Assoc., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company issued a disability insurance policy to Martin John Kersten using a definition of sickness that limited coverage of pre-existing conditions to those…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Kenneth B. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API