Legal Opinion

Z. Russ & Sons Co. v. Crichton

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1897No. S. F. No. 545PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. G. W. Hunter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This action was brought to enjoin the defendant, as tax collector of the county of Humboldt, from executing to the state of California, and filing for record in the office of the county recorder of the county, tax deeds for the lands described in the complaint. Three causes of action are set forth in the complaint, to each of which a general demurrer was interposed and sustained. Thereupon judgment was entered that the plaintiff take nothing by the action, and from that judgment it has appealed.

The facts stated in the complaint are in substance as follows:

The lands described in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Grimm v. O'ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Tuttle v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People ex rel. San Francisco & San Joaquin Railway Co. v. CraycroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Reclamation District No. 551 v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API