Legal Opinion

Ede v. Hazen

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1882No. 8094PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for defendants, in the Superior Court of Plumas County. Clough, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

If the plaintiffs are entitled to any relief, they might have obtained it by malting a timely application to the Court, in which the judgment, they seek to have set aside,' was rendered. That judgment was entered on the tenth day of December, 1880, and on the eighteenth day of January, 1881, the plaintiffs were informed that the mortgage foreclosed had been fully satisfied prior to the entry of the judgment of foreclosure. If they might have successfully pleaded that satisfaction, as a defense to the action, and were prevented from doing so, by reason of the concealment of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borland v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Bibend v. KreutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Ketchum v. CrippenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. California Beet Sugar Co. v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Brum v. IvinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API