Legal Opinion
Sakaguchi v. Sakaguchi
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 2009No. B208353PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Takeshi Ted Sakaguchi 1 appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside an entry of default and subsequent default judgment against him. His primary argument is that service of process and the statement of damages were defective. Because of that, he contends, the judgment is void or voidable and subject to being set aside pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 473, subdivision (d), and 473.5, or under the court’s equitable power. 2
We conclude service was proper, and Takeshi is not entitled to relief on statutory or equitable grounds. We shall affirm the order.
F…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- TRACKMAN v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Calvert v. Al Binali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Manson, Iver & York v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Rodriguez v. Nam Min ChoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.