Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Shipman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the j. city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. \
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
On the 21st of November, 1879, Alice Dorland recovered a judgment in the District Court of the twenty-third judicial district for the city and county of San Francisco, against J. S. Alemany and the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society, for foreclosure of a lien upon a certain tract of land, to secure satisfaction of of the sum of $5,902 and costs of suit.
The present constitution abolished the District Courts, and created Superior Courts to succeed them. As the successor of the.District Court of the city and county of San Francisco, the Superior Court of said city and county, on the 8th of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hawley & King v. JamesNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Sanders v. . Village of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ethics Commission v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Page v. W. W. Chase Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Z. Russ & Sons Co. v. CrichtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.