State v. Eaton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This is a consolidated appeal in which the state seeks reversal of pretrial suppression orders. The trial court entered identical orders in all the cases allowing part of defendants’ motion to suppress. Defendants cross-appeal from part of the trial court’s order. We reverse the order of suppression and remand for trial.
On July 18, 1981, deputy sheriff Claar obtained a search warrant for defendants’ rural property, including a residence and several outbuildings. Deputy Claar was the affiant in the supporting affidavit:
“I, David Claar, being duly sworn, do hereby depose and say the following…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. AgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AnspachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Mercer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.