Legal Opinion

State v. Mickelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 1974No. C74-01-0152PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Defendant was indicted for criminal activity in drugs (possession of amphetamine sulfate). Her motion to suppress amphetamine tablets seized by the arresting officer was granted by the trial court and the state appeals. We affirm.

On January 17, 1974, narcotics officers executed a warrant to search an apartment and the person of a named tenant other than the defendant, for heroin. Defendant, along with others, was on the premises when the warrant was executed. She was held in the living room by Sergeant Johnson while other officers searched the rest of the apartment.

Deputy Chaney searched the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. BarnesHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GrodaOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. MathisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API