State v. Willis
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*411SCHWAB, C. J.
The state appeals from an order suppressing drugs seized pursuant to a warrant. The sole issue is whether the affidavit upon which the warrant was based alleged facts sufficient to create a well-warranted suspicion that the drugs were presently in the premises described in the affidavit. The relevant allegations are:
«* * * [T]his informant informed me that within the past 48 hours this informant has been in the premises of * * * WILSON * * *. That while in the premises of * * * WILSON my informant did purchase a quantity of heroin from the said * * * WILSON;
"Further, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. KrohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. EmfingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.