Legal Opinion

State v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1976No. C 75-03-0981 Cr, CA 4814PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*411SCHWAB, C. J.

The state appeals from an order suppressing drugs seized pursuant to a warrant. The sole issue is whether the affidavit upon which the warrant was based alleged facts sufficient to create a well-warranted suspicion that the drugs were presently in the premises described in the affidavit. The relevant allegations are:

«* * * [T]his informant informed me that within the past 48 hours this informant has been in the premises of * * * WILSON * * *. That while in the premises of * * * WILSON my informant did purchase a quantity of heroin from the said * * * WILSON;

"Further, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. KrohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. EmfingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API