Legal Opinion
Dye v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 27, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1372 (PLF)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
This matter is before the Court on the motions to dismiss of defendants the United States, Kansas, Delaware, New Jersey and North Carolina. On August 1, 2006, several pro se plaintiffs filed suit against defendants seeking a wide range of relief from a litany of legal proceedings, including a federal tax lien, a state property foreclosure, a traffic ticket, an arrest warrant for contempt of court, a jailing for contempt of court, a sale of a house at a sheriffs sale, a fraud conviction and a tax warrant. See Complaint for Ex Parte…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nurriddin v. BoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hoffman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Bailey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Kaufman v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Scurlock v. LappinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.