Legal Opinion
Scurlock v. Lappins
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1833PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Alonzo Scurlock, brings this action pro se, seeking damages for harms incurred while he was a prisoner at United States Penitentiary Lee in Jonesville, Virginia. He has named as defendants the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), former director of the BOP Harley Lappin, 1 and BOP employees David Allred, Michael Chamlee, Noland Crowe, J.L. Norwood, Terry O’Brien, Dennis Peliter, Lt. Pitts, 2 David Roff, and Todd Sloop in their individual and official capacities. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Crowe assaulted and falsely…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Palmieri v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Berry v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Estate of Matthews v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Harris v. FulwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.