Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 17, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1027 (RMU)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting Wmata’s Partial Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; Denying as Moot Wmata’s Partial Motion to Dismiss the Original Complaint
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the partial motion to dismiss filed by defendant the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). 1 The plaintiff, a WMATA employee, alleges that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., the Americans with…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Thomas v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bradley v. DewineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bailey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Laverpool v. Taylor Bean & Whitaker Reo LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.