Legal Opinion

California Valley Miwok Tribe v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2006No. CIV.A. 05-0739(JR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERTSON, District Judge.

The California Valley Miwok Tribe, an Indian tribe “recognized and eligible for funding and services” pursuant to Section 104 of the Act of November 2,1994, Pub.L. 103-454, 108 Stat. 4791, see 70 FR 71194, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against what it calls federal government interference with its internal affairs. The government moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Dkt. # 15-1. For the reasons set forth below, the government’s motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 15-1] will be granted.

1. Background

In 1915, a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Seminole Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. California Valley Miwok Tribe v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. California Valley Miwok Tribe v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. California Valley Miwok Tribe v. California Gambling Control CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. California Valley Miwok Tribe v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. California Valley Miwok Tribe v. HaalandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API