Legal Opinion

Garrett v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided August 28, 1985No. 83-1842PublishedCited by 931 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

This case requires us to examine the double jeopardy implications of a prosecution for engaging in a “continuing criminal enterprise” (CCE), in violation of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, 21 U. S. C. § 848, when facts underlying a prior conviction are offered to prove one of three predicate offenses that must be shown to make out a CCE violation. Petitioner Jonathan Garrett contends that his prior conviction is a lesser included offense of the CCE charge, and, therefore, that the CCE prosecution is barred under Brown v. Ohio, 432 U. S. 161 (1977).

Between 1976…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by931 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

926 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API