Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

California Valley Miwok Tribe v. Haaland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 12, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-1740Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 22-cv-1740 (JMC) v. DEB HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION For Indian tribes across the nation, formal organization under the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) embodies two bedrock principles of federal Indian law: the right of a tribe to dignified treatment as a sovereign people endowed “with the power of regulating their internal and social relations” on one hand, see Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez,

436 U.S. 49, 55

(1978), and “the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API