Legal Opinion
Matthew Noble v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 3, 1996No. 95-5229PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
An opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL accompanies this order.
ORDER
2Per curiam
CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF LAW
by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-728
On March 26, 1996, we heard oral argument in United States Parole Commission v. Matthew Noble, No. 95-5229. Determinative of the appeal is a significant question of District of Columbia law as to which there is no controlling precedent in the decisions of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. We therefore certify to the District…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Luck v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Joseph Tyler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Henry B. Johnson v. Jerry Williford, Warden, Henry B. Johnson v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Walker v. LutherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Noble v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- James F. Johnson v. Thomas Kindt, Warden and U.S. Parole Commission, District of Columbia, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.