Legal Opinion
James F. Johnson v. Thomas Kindt, Warden and U.S. Parole Commission, District of Columbia, Amicus Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1998No. 96-6154PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellee James F. Johnson is an inmate in federal custody serving an aggregate U.S.Code and District of Columbia (D.C.) Code sentence. In district court, Johnson filed a habeas petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, arguing that he was entitled to credit under his D.C. sentence for “street time” accrued prior to revocation of his parole. The district court agreed and granted the requested relief. On appeal by respondents-appellants Thomas Kindt and the U.S. Parole Commission (the Commission), we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hawkins v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellant v. Erwin Darrell Newman,amended OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.