Legal Opinion
Joseph Tyler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1991No. 90-35389PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Tyler’s parole was revoked after he violated its conditions. The parole commission determined that upon revocation he must forfeit the credit he would otherwise have received for his “street time.” 1 Unhappy with the resulting delay of his mandatory release date, Tyler contested the forfeiture by a federal habeas motion. He appeals its denial.
BACKGROUND
In 1983, the Superior Court for the District of Columbia accepted a guilty plea to robbery from Joseph Michael Tyler. He received an indeterminate sentence of three to nine years imprisonment and was incarcerated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Childers v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- John G. Brown v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden, Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Luck v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.