Legal Opinion
Noble v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 5, 1999No. 99-5009PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Matthew Noble, a District of Columbia prisoner who was held in federal custody, appeals the district court’s denial of a writ of habeas corpus. He argues that he has been deprived of equal protection because other prisoners were erroneously released earlier than they should have been. We affirm.
I
The District of Columbia is responsible for the custody of most prisoners who have been convicted of offenses under D.C. law, but some D.C. offenders are held in the custody of the federal government. This case arises from a disparity between the policies of the…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Louis R. Hutcherson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Robert Franklin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- M.K. v. TenetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- March for Life v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Anderson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Jones v. National Council on DisabilityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.