Legal Opinion

Walker v. Luther

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 6, 1987No. Nos. 730, 731; Dockets 86-2342, 86-2356PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

The question presented on the appeal is whether a prisoner should have his term of confinement determined by two separate parole authorities simultaneously exercising parole power over him. From the standpoint of parole fairness — which is Congress’ purpose — this is not a situation where two heads are better than one. Instead, release rules that are reasonably expected to be consistently applied become confounded. Here the United States Parole Commission and the District of Columbia Parole Board exercise simultaneous parole powers over District of Columbia offenders.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Joseph E.L. Sullivan v. David R. Freeman and James C. DelworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Timothy Thomas v. Edward Brennan, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Oxford, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Joseph Tyler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API