Legal Opinion
United States Parole Commission v. Noble
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 1998No. 96-SP-578PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Per curiam
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit certified the following question to this court, pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-723 (1995):
Under District of Columbia law, ... did the United States Parole Commission properly interpret sections 24-206(a) and 24-431(a) of the District of Columbia Code in deciding that, after revocation of a person’s parole, time that the person spent on parole before revocation cannot be credited against his sentence?
Noble v. United States Parole Comm’n, 317 U.S.App. D.C. 304, 305, 82 F.3d 1108, 1109 (1996). In an opinion released April…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Matthew Noble v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
3Cited by53 opinions
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tippett v. DalyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- District of Columbia Office of Human Rights v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.