Legal Opinion
United States Parole Commission v. Noble
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1997No. 96-SP-578PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has certified to this court, pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-723 (1995 Repl.), the following question:
Under District of Columbia law, given the facts described below, did the United States Parole Commission properly interpret sections 24-206(a) and 24-431(a) of the District of Columbia Code in deciding that, after revocation of a person’s parole, time that the person spent on parole before revocation cannot be credited against his sentence?
Noble v. United States Parole Comm’n, 317 U.S.App. D.C. 304, 305,…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tippett v. DalyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.