Legal Opinion
United States v. King
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 2013No. 11-10182PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
ORDER
The opinion filed March 8, 2013, and published at 711 F.3d 986, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order.
With these amendments, Judges Graber and Tallman have voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Berzon has voted to grant it.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.
Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or for rehearing en banc shall be entertained.
OPINION
GRAB…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Paulo LaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Valentino JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. JobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- People v. RomeoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- United States v. Steven CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.