Legal Opinion

United States v. Paulo Lara

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2016No. 14-50120PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant-Defendant Paulo Lara appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At the time of his arrest, Lara was subject to a term of probation that required him to submit his “person and property, including any residence, premises, container or vehicle” to search and seizure “without a warrant, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion.” Lara contends that his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated when probation officers conducted two…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. Miguel CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Steven DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. United States v. Valentino JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. JobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. State v. Don Jacob HavatoneArizona Supreme Court · 2017

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API