Legal Opinion

United States v. Steven Cervantes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2017No. 15-50459PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATFORD, Circuit Judge:

Steven Cervantes was convicted in California state court of several non-violent felonies and sentenced to three years in county jail. He served the last year of that sentence on “mandatory supervision,” a form of conditional release that is similar to parole. As a condition of mandatory supervision, Cervantes agreed to submit to warrantless, suspicionless searches of his person, his residence, and any “premises” under his control. We must decide whether a warrantless, suspicionless search of a hotel room Cervantes rented with his girlfriend violated the Fourth Amendment.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Valentino JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Anthony PedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Kyle KorteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Cynthia MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Howard DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API