United States v. Steven Cervantes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WATFORD, Circuit Judge:
Steven Cervantes was convicted in California state court of several non-violent felonies and sentenced to three years in county jail. He served the last year of that sentence on “mandatory supervision,” a form of conditional release that is similar to parole. As a condition of mandatory supervision, Cervantes agreed to submit to warrantless, suspicionless searches of his person, his residence, and any “premises” under his control. We must decide whether a warrantless, suspicionless search of a hotel room Cervantes rented with his girlfriend violated the Fourth Amendment.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Valentino JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Anthony PedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Kyle KorteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Cynthia MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Howard DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.