People v. Bravo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI, J.
In this proceeding we review a decision of the Court of Appeal reversing a judgment of conviction in a criminal case. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28(a)(2).) The Court of Appeal held that a condition of probation that expressly authorizes only a warrantless search cannot properly be construed as permitting a search without reasonable cause. We disagree and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
I
On January 20, 1981, appellant was convicted of possessing concentrated cannabis (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (a)). He was granted probation and, as a condition of that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.