Legal Opinion

United States v. Job

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2017No. 14-50472PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, District Judge:

ORDER

The opinion filed on March 14, 2017 is amended as follows:

On page 896, paragraphs 2-3 remove <for two reasons. First, it> and replace with <It>.

On page 896, paragraph 3 after cunder-took the search. > add <The district court erred in denying Job’s motions to suppress evidence from all three searches solely on the basis of Job’s Fourth Amendment search waiver. >

On page 896-97 delete the fourth and first paragraphs and replace with <In addition, we note that the district court failed to recognize that our decision in King was limited to individuals on probation for…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. MaximIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. United States v. Donnell ArtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. In re: D.D.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Marcus Zanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  5. United States v. Sri WijegoonaratnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API