Legal Opinion

People v. Romeo

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 2015No. A140146PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STREETER, J.

“ ‘[P]rivate residences are places in which the individual normally expects privacy free of governmental intrusion not authorized by a warrant, and that expectation is plainly one that society is prepared to recognize as justifiable.’ [Citations.] Likewise, a garage that is attached or adjacent to a home may give rise to a legitimate expectation of privacy therein. [Citations.] Under the Fourth Amendment, a warrantless search of such an area is unreasonable per se unless it falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement, for example, where consent to the…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. TacardonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  2. People v. Sandee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Barajas v. City of Rohnert ParkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. People v. Alexander, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. People v. Thomas, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API