Legal Opinion

Samson v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 2006No. 04-9728PublishedCited by 853 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

California law provides that every prisoner eligible for release on state parole “shall agree in writing to be subject to search or seizure by a parole officer or other peace officer at any time of the day or night, with or without a search warrant and with or without cause.” Cal. Penal Code Ann. § 3067(a) (West 2000). We granted certiorari to decide whether a suspicionless search, conducted under the authority of this statute, violates the Constitution. We hold that it does not.

I

In September 2002, petitioner Donald Curtis Samson was on state parole in California, following a conviction for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by853 opinions

  1. United States v. Nicholas Omar MidgetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Delores Henry v. Melody HulettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Warshak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano OchoaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

848 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API