Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. Wilmer
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Application for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant for the term of one year from the 26th of January, 1918, from soliciting orders or performing labor in the window cleaning business.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The plaintiffs’ claim for injunctive relief is based upon an agreement made between the parties to this action on the 6th day of August, 1917, which agreement contains the following:
“ That the said Max Wilmer agrees to faithfully and diligently work for the said National House and Window Cleaning Company as a window cleaner and *389to do such work and at suck place as directed by the said party of the first part.
“ This contract shall remain in full force and effect as long as the said party of the second part shall continue to perform and give satisfactory services as a window cleaner. The said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mutual Milk & Cream Co. v. HeldtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- A. L. & J. J. Reynolds Co. v. DreyerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Geo. A. Kessler & Co. v. ChappelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Amalgamated Industrial Corp. v. TeichholtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- M. Witmark & Sons v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Super Maid Cook-Ware Corporation v. HamilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Ridley v. KroutWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Standard Oil Co. v. BertelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Lantieri Beauty Salon, Inc. v. YaleNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.