Legal Opinion

Lantieri Beauty Salon, Inc. v. Yale

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

In order to be valid, a promise imposing a restraint in occupation must be reasonable. (Restatement of the Law of Contracts, §'§ 515, 516.) In considering what is reasonable regard must be given to the question whether the promise is wider than is necessary to the protection of the employer, the effect of the promise on the employee, and the effect upon the public. (5 Williston on Contracts [Rev. ed.], § 1636; United States v. Addyston Pipe, etc., Co., 85 Fed. 271 [per Taft, J.]; affd., 175 U. S. 211; Clark Paper & Mfg. Co. v. Stenacher, 236 N. Y. 312; Corpin v. Wheatley, 227 App. Div. 212;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Corpin v. WheatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Gilbert v. WilmerNew York Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Murray v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Lynch v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API