Legal Opinion

Mutual Milk & Cream Co. v. Heldt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1907PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by the. plaintiff, the Mutual Milk and Cream Company, • from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of' the cleric of the county of New York on the 10th day of May, 1907, denying the plaintiff’s .■ motion for an in junction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying its motion for an injunction pendente lite. The defendant entered into an agreement with the plaintiff by which he was employed as a driver' and collector at the rate of thirteen dollars per week. The. plaintiff agreed to give him one week’s notice in case his services were no longer required, and defendant agreed to perform his services honestly and give one week’s notice in case he wished to sever his connection with the company and deposited fifty dollars as a guaranty of good faith and honesty while in its employ.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mutual Milk & Cream Co. v. PriggeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Witkop & Holmes Co. v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Heflebower v. SandDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
  5. Gilbert v. WilmerNew York Supreme Court · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API