Legal Opinion

Super Maid Cook-Ware Corporation v. Hamil

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1931No. 6209PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal has for its object the reversal of the decree of the court below which refused to enforce by injunction two restrictive covenants, under one of which each defendant agreed that “he would not for a period of one year, immediately after the termination of this contract, either for himself or for any other person, firm or corporation, either directly or indirectly, sell or attempt to sell any aluminum cookware, or solicit the purchase of the same in any city or community in which he shall have operated under this agreement, and within a radius of one hundred…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Union Trust Co. v. GrosmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Nachman Spring-Filled Corporation v. Kay Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Grace v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API