Legal Opinion

Geo. A. Kessler & Co. v. Chappelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Geo. A. Kessler & Co., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 22d day of May, 1902, denying the plaintiff’s motion to continue an injunction_p

1Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.:

On the 2d of December, 1901, the copartnership of Geo. A. Kessler & Go. were the agents of the firm of Chandon & Co., successors to Moet & Chandon, of Epernay, France, to sell in the United States of America the champagne wines manufactured and produced by said firm of Chandon & Co. Upon said date the •said copartnership entered into an agreement in writing with the defendant, by which agreement it was provided that said copartnership should be exclusively entitled to the services of the defendant for the period of five years, and the defendant agreed that he would not for…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCall Co. v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Columbia College of Music & School of Dramatic Art v. TunbergWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Corpin v. WheatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Gilbert v. WilmerNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Magid v. TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API