Legal Opinion

Ridley v. Krout

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1947No. 2355PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Justice.

This is an action for an injunction by the plaintiff against the defendant. The injunction was denied and plaintiff has appealed to this court.

The plaintiff is the owner and conducts the so-called Ridley’s Repair Shop. He and his father had conducted that repair shop for a period of forty years prior to 1939. Repairs of various mechanical devices are made in the shop. Defendant Krout was a mechanic, particularly in repairing automobiles and bicycles. He entered into the employ of the plaintiff about January, 1939, and on July 10,1939, plaintiff required defendant to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  3. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Osage Glass, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API