Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Industrial Corp. v. Teichholtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Amalgamated Industrial Corporation, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 23d day of February, 1917, denying plaintiff’s motion to continue pendente lite an injunction heretofore granted.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

Defendant, being a stockholder in a corporation which amalgamated with others to form the plaintiff corporation, sold all of his stock to plaintiff in return for stock of plaintiff and a contract of employment for ten years, in return for which he agreed to devote his undivided time and efforts to the business of plaintiff. He also agreed “ that he will not engage in the *457business of window cleaning and house renovating or any similar business within a radius of thirty miles of Times Square, New York, for the period of ten years after the termination of his employment with the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Alden v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Bronze Corp. v. SchmelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gilbert v. WilmerNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. John T. Stanley Co. v. LagomarsinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API