Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of R.J.E.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 2002No. C4-00-2189PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Fifteen-year-old R.J.E. was charged with criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree. Following the denial of a motion to suppress statements that he contended were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), R.J.E. pled not guilty and agreed to a delinquency hearing on stipulated facts, in accordance with State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854 (Minn.1980).1 The district court adjudicated R.J.E. delinquent based on the stipulated facts. On appeal, the court of appeals held that, while the district court’s denial of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KebasoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In re the Welfare of B.A.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In re the Welfare of J.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Kalmakoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.