Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of J.H.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 2014No. A12-1405PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
The issue in this case is what express findings a juvenile court is required to make, pursuant to MinmStat. § 260B.125, subds. 3-4 (2012), when determining whether a child has overcome by clear and convincing evidence the presumption in favor of certification to adult court. Respondent J.H. was charged by juvenile petition, as both a principal and an accomplice, with criminal sexual conduct, conspiracy to commit first-degree criminal sexual conduct, kidnapping, and committing a crime for the benefit of a gang arising out of the rape of a 14-year-old girl. Following a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. OstremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In reSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, formerly d/b/a Lori Peterson and Associates.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. E., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. G. G., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.